Showing posts with label allison rossett. Show all posts
Showing posts with label allison rossett. Show all posts

Tuesday, May 24, 2011

Falling in Love all Over Again with ISD – with Allison Rossett at #ASTD2011

These are my notes from a session with Allison Rossett “Falling in Love All Over Again—With ISD” at ASTD ICE in Orlando, May 24, 2011. Forgive typos and incoherence…

*****

ISD got its start in WWII – when the country was preparing soldiers for war. 400 + films – taught standards. Observations in classes to see that standards were met.

From the war, these trainer types went into industry – telecom (ATT)

Walter Dick – “ISD is applied educational psychology”

Instructional design is all abut theory.

Behaviorism – incentives and consequences. what it looks like when you can do it. Get drill and practice, with knowledge of results. Practice, practice, practice. Great for pronunciation and vocab (Rosetta stone)

Cognitivism – what’s going on inside. Motivation. The mind and belly stuff.  Do they GET IT? Think alouds, scenarios, checklists.

Constructivism – bred of cognitivism. Discovery learning.  Find the key messages yourself.  Your own way of being better with customers. When people find their own way, they really get it. Webquests.  Emphasize the process of engaging with others – where there’s no one agreed upon outcome. John Dewey, Bruno, Vgotsky, Brent Wilson…

Connectivism – from know-how to know-where. Find it yourself through networks and community. Downes, Siemens. Personal knowledge management.

Motivation Theory – John Keller, ARCS (Attention, Relevance, Confidence, Satisfaction)

“Adult Learning Theory” – she doesn’t believe in it. Good learning theory is good learning theory.  Difference is that kids want to talk about dinosaurs.

Connectivism & ARCS: US Navy’s Project MMOWGLI – thousands of players participate to work with pirate attacks off of Somalia.  This is a gnarly problem. Don’t know what the protocol or policy is – not teaching to objectives – but we’re trying to figure it out.

ID Basics:

  • begin with the end in mind, data drives decisions, classroom is good but often not sufficient
  • ID is how we make good decisions

ADDIE – the problem with this…

ID Greatness:

They can see it is all about them their tasks, their priorities.  The WIIFM.

The experience is vivid and authentic – full of worked examples, with opps to think about and DO something. “So that’s how it works” – with commentary and progressive building checklists that explains how it works.

Success and stretch. (If it’s all success, then it feels like a waste of time).

The ID brings order to chaos. Make choices to extend lessons, information, etc. Don’t let the learner just flop about.

Evidence-Based Instructional Design

  • just serving up a tasty buffet isn’t enough.
  • people learn best with worked examples, repeated practice on stretch tasks

Greatness emerges from positive deviance!

Example of sales training in pharma:

  • Find the lesson or message you want them to know. Have a really clear way – not a spreadsheet! – where we clearly communicate what greatness will look like.
  • Then have classes, simulation. etc.
  • On demand support

Great ID for CPR Training?

(www.articulate.com showcase example).  You find a person and you have 3 minutes to save the person. “You are walking down the street when a man falls to the ground…”  The conditions are real. It’s scary.

You don’t need stuff until you need it – performance support “Adult CPR app” – American Heart Association app.

Will you have it in the moment of stress?

Great ID touches minds and hearts.

Assure that employees experience some success as they grow. Build in success. Don’t start with a test that brings them to their knees. Not good for confidence.

Reveal your sources – why are they credible? – tell stories

Use two side arguments. Approaches that admit multiple views are more convincing than one-sided litany. Assume they are smart. People learn better from controversy.

Prepare them for the barriers you discovered when you did the analysis. Share the issues to come and the workarounds.

Encourage reflection. Provide some structure.

Use role modeling and conversations.

Use stories – show emotions and reactions.

Engage people in examination of examples.

Touch minds and hearts with stories that ring TRUE.

Deliver smarts – shifting it closer to where it’s needed.

 

Moving Forward

Always: practice, feedback, examples

Today: scenarios, commentary, checklists, coaching, problem solving, aided (mobile support) and unaided performance (learning)

Tomorrow: organization knowledge, community, social networks, performance support, choice!

 

Giving learners choices – is too much freedom too much?

Sometimes the learner doesn’t know enough to make a good choice. Need good scaffolding. The ID picks the right spots for choices. Help the learner make a good choice – structure. Don’t want to give them so much freedom that they fail or lose confidence.

Great ID:

  • delivers solution systems
  • delivers in rooms and into the workplace
  • it is influential

Thursday, January 28, 2010

Allison Rossett: ELearning Isn’t What You Think It Is – Not Yet #tk10

My live blogged notes…ASTD TechKnowledge 2010 in Las Vegas, NV.

Allison Rossett is a Professor of Educational Technology at University of San Diego and noted author.

Recap of her recent article for ASTD: e-Learning – What’s Old is New Again

When you say you’re doing elearning what are you doing?  The big names talk about how web 2.0 is turning courses on their heads (Downes, Rosenberg…)

Here’s how Rossett created survey:

Step 1: Defined what’s in and what’s out

  • what are people doing today?
  • what are aspirations for the future?
  • barriers to elearning today?
  • (didn’t ask about quality, efficiency, satisfaction)

Step 2: Defined the options

They constructed 26 snapshots (options derived from literature, conferences, blogs, etc.) – e.g., “Our programs are delivered in a virtual classroom.    Employees join an instructor and classmates at a scheduled time.” or “Our programs are delivered on mobile devices.”

Step 3:  Piloted and edited

Step 4: Solicited participation from 5 sources – elearning guild, learning circuits, trainingindustry.com, ISPI, PINOTnet.ning.com)

This is not a random sample, but rather opportunistic!   Self-selected people who are already out in tech circles.

953 respondents to survey.

The results are suggestive and provocative. Take them home and engage in conversations with your colleagues.  Use this data to advance dialogue within your organization.

So what do you think is typical of practice today?  Are you doing any of these in your organization?

  • ecoaching
  • personalized learning programs
  • tests of skills and knowledge
  • online discussions after class
  • mobile devices and delivery
  • virtual classroom, then archived and available as needed
  • scenario-based online programs

Top 5 practices (these are the most common, but still not that common – showing there are no typical practices!):

  • Our programs included test of skills and knowledge
  • We use computers as part of classroom instruction
  • Our programs present content and opps to practice and receive feedback.  Employees work on these tutorials at a time of own choosing.
  • Our programs use visuals with an audio track. Ees watch and listen at time of choosing.
  • Our programs are based on realistic scenarios which presss employees to make choices and learn from the results of those choices.

Bottom ranking practices:

  • Mobile devices
  • Virtual classrooms.
  • Authentic, realistic and immersive, like Second Life
  • Include access to e-coaches
  • Include expectations that employees will participate in online discussions as follow up to a class. [The problem is that we focus on the event - ‘the event’s the thing.’  Need to make expectations clear – this is not just a nice to have, but an important part of the story.  Rossett grades students’ papers, but also their comments in the discussion board.  Don’t ask ‘what do you think of article?’, instead ask to ‘compare and contrast’, make question useful and real ‘how would you sell this into this market?’…]

What of you? Which best describes you as  you think about the many possible manifestations for e-learning?

  • We are using technology in many ways
  • We are doing a few things, but not many
  • We do one thing

What of blended learning? (Blended = some of this, some of that, bound together)

  • Lots going on
  • Some
  • Not so much

Why blends?  -- it’s like a good dinner,  multi-modal, has variety and autonomy…

Rossett’s best reason for blends:  lessons, information and support (performance and coaching) goes where the need is – into the workplace  (need to keep your blend from flopping around).

What of the much touted 2.0?

  • Lots going on
  • Some
  • Not so much

[Data of the crowd in the session is matching data from her survey results.]

Second Life – figures debating the benefits of first life:  http://tinyurl.com/ylfksgh Very fresh!

Top 10 Aspirations (out of 26) – asked to pick your top 3 aspirations:

  1. Personalized learning (21.4%)
  2. Problem solving, Knowledge Construction (21.3%)
  3. Measurement for Program Improvement (19.4%)
  4. Mobile Learnng & Support (18.4%)
  5. Employee generated Content (17.2%)
  6. Online Networks & Collab (16.3%)
  7. Authentic & Immersive Experiences (15.1%)
  8. Performance Support (15.1%)
  9. Assessment Point People to Relevant Programs (15%)
  10. Scenario based ELearning (14.3%)

But looking at results – there is no cluster.  Web 2.0 is high on the list…

Barriers

  1. We can’t afford
  2. Difficult to move people to learn in new ways (Rossett thinks the issue is the employees we train, but the # one key figure to get more out of tech – supervisors/manager).
  3. Our tech is not up to these approaches
  4. Employees hesitate to contribute to social networks and communities
  5. Our customers and clients prefer classroom instruction

Current professional practice does not match what we hear at conferences, on blogs, etc. 

Clayton Christenson  ~ “we incrementally improve what we’re doing today, we tinker with courseware, instead of taking advantage of learning disruption that is happening all around us!”

Current practice is more additive than supplantive (disruptive) – we add a podcast to a current course.  Don’t start with the status quo and then make it a little better…

Look at great practice and tease out what great managers do:  www.Positivedeviance.org

Are we over cautious – should we do MORE?

What does it mean?

  • Instructional design is still alive.
  • Scattershot practice – no one way, few shared habits.
  • Little of 2.0 yet.
  • Where are the mobile devices? eCoaching?
  • Preference for individual strategies (more than ‘social’) – more excited about individualization – a program just for me…
  • Leaders reported more of everything than practitioners

What are YOU going to do?  What are you going to do differently?

Weigh in please – http://tinyurl.elearningpractice -- Add your data to the set, see what the 26 snapshots are, etc. Make Allison’s dreams come true – sit around with your colleagues and talk about the 26 snapshots, talk about the opportunities…

For the record, Allison Rossett is an awesome presenter!! Funny, engaging, opinionated and lots of expertise.