tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28999673.post5801563222879689414..comments2024-03-16T04:47:28.312-05:00Comments on Cammy Bean's Learning Visions: Humble Learning MomentCammy Beanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14164253880427035485noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28999673.post-70501182802029117622007-05-08T20:33:00.000-05:002007-05-08T20:33:00.000-05:00Clark, Thanks for the response. I didn't mean to...Clark, <BR/><BR/>Thanks for the response. I didn't mean to lump you in with the learning styles approach -- in fact, the opposite. The point I was trying to make, albeit poorly, was that those who go by a learning styles approach might look to multiple representations as a way to hit all of the learning styles. <BR/><BR/>Instead, as you argue, we should be using multiple representations as a way to build stronger connections in the learner's mind.<BR/><BR/>I'll look more into Rand Spiro -- CFT sounds interesting. Thanks.Cammy Beanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14164253880427035485noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28999673.post-86042691204788916452007-05-08T19:38:00.000-05:002007-05-08T19:38:00.000-05:00Cammy, I appreciate the citation, but I'd argue fo...Cammy, I appreciate the citation, but I'd argue for the multiple representations more from a Cognitive Flexibility Theory (Rand Spiro) than for a learning styles approach. I'm pretty skeptical of learning styles stuff, frankly (and justifiably). CFT is more for ill-structured problems than known material, but that's most of what's important anyway.Clarkhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07822235162664957878noreply@blogger.com